Skip to content

The Crestmont Project

April 28, 2010

As many neighbors will know, there’s an ongoing proposal to build 34 new units of housing at the end of Crestmont. The City is currently conducting an Environmental Impact Review (EIR), and Dr Sam Sobol (of the Crestmont- Mt Sutro Neighborhood Preservation Coalition) tells us the draft EIR is expected to be completed in September or October 2010.  A large group of neighbors opposes it, and the Coalition’s website (click on the Stop sign to access it) details who to write to. That website also has more detailed information about the project and related issues. And photographs.

WHY THE OBJECTION

The project would extend Crestmont after a hairpin bend where the cul-de-sac ends now, and build along the lower edge of the resulting 20-foot road. This may impinge on land currently owned by a neighborhood association.

What’s the problem with the project?

This Google Map demonstrates some of the issues with the project. This is one of the steepest areas of the mountain. (The map already shows this road, complete with hairpin bend, even though it currently doesn’t exist – it’s a narrow mud trail. )

The hills are not only steep, they are not very stable. There’s a history of rock-slides, including the destruction of a home, fortunately unoccupied at the time.

The houses above where the planned project would go already rest on high stilts of steel or concrete. Residents fear that construction activities could weaken the hillside, putting the whole group of houses above it – and all the people in them – at risk during an earthquake.

(Click here for photographs of the site from the website of the Coalition.)

OTHER CONCERNS

  • Increased traffic and increased accident risk on a narrow and winding road. “…Drastically increased traffic density of Crestmont Drive, a roadway so narrow beyond the uphill bulkhead that two cars are unable to pass when cars are parked, as they always are, on either side of the street..”
  • Risk to children playing on the street (since Crestmont Drive homes lack yards).
  • Limited access for fire and emergency vehicles. The street below the hairpin bend would be a dead end and only smaller vehicles could turn there.
  • Too little parking. The plan allows for 1.5 parking spaces per 3 and 4 bedroom unit. Since this the terrain limits access to public transport,  each household will probably need 2-3 cars, especially if the condos are rented as shared housing.
  • The wind usually blows uphill from the west. It would carry noise,  and fumes from cars, fireplaces, barbeques, up to the homes above. It also heightens the fire risk. If a fire started in a downhill building,  the wind could carry cinders uphill and ignite the all-wooden homes above, while also setting brushfires in surrounding areas.
  • Four large high density buildings and a total of 34 condos would change character of this neighborhood of single family homes and duplexes,  and have a negative impact on home values.
  • The existing trail functions as a neighborhood park and open space, accessible even to those who cannot climb the steep hillside of Mt Sutro to get to the mountain trails. This is one of the few pristine areas that has never been built on.

About these ads
13 Comments leave one →
  1. Lulu permalink
    April 28, 2010 1:27 pm

    Traffic Comment: Not only the Crestmont houses lack yards. This is a condition throughout the neighborhood. Some of us have small patios – if you have kids, you’ll know how useless those are for playing! So, the observation that kids have no where to play but on the street extends through much of Forest Knolls.

    The 100 or so extra cars driving by our houses every day from the added residents and their visitors wouldn’t help anyone. And the traffic control in Forest Knolls is pretty bad as it is. People race around like mad. On the windy, narrow Crestmont, full of blind curves, people get stuck behind the garbage trucks in the morning, even now.

    This project was always a bad idea.

Trackbacks

  1. Updates: Elections, UCSF Community Center, Crestmont « FOREST KNOLLS
  2. Crestmont plan rides again? « FOREST KNOLLS
  3. Crestmont Development: New Name, Fast Track « FOREST KNOLLS
  4. Update: Fight the SF Overlook Development, Get the T-shirt! « FOREST KNOLLS
  5. Redistricting, SF Overlook, and Coit Tower: West of Twin Peaks Central Council Meeting, Jan 2012 « FOREST KNOLLS
  6. Crestmont Battle: Draft Environment Impact Report is Out « FOREST KNOLLS
  7. Crestmont Preservation Update « FOREST KNOLLS
  8. Crestmont Preservation: Comments from Mt Sutro Woods « FOREST KNOLLS
  9. D7 Supervisor Candidates on ‘San Francisco Overlook Project’ « FOREST KNOLLS
  10. Crestmont Preservation Coalition Bulletin « FOREST KNOLLS
  11. ‘Westside Observer’ Covers Crestmont Controversy | FOREST KNOLLS
  12. SF Planning Commission Approves San Francisco Overlook Project | FOREST KNOLLS

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 95 other followers

%d bloggers like this: